- Joined
- Oct 23, 2014
- Messages
- 4,312
- Reaction score
- 5,816
www.frontlinemds.com
Dawg
Dawg
Totally and absolutely. I had read this article on a few sites recently. Basically, the authors of a report on the use of Ivermectin to help with Covid19 just pulled it from publication, Basically the results seemed to have no relationship to the raw data.
https://www.theguardian.com/science...vid-treatment-withdrawn-over-ethical-concerns
"...America, nobody needs to die." says Dr. Stella Immanuel
This says it all!
Very poor choice of words, and for a "Dr." that is a very very bad thing.
We humans think in and with words, if one can not clearly speak one probably can not cogently think! I'm guessing she means nobody needs to die of Covid but one should never ever have to guess what a Doctor means.
"come on man!"
Ground yourself in the science - what it says and what it DOESN"T say, as opposed to media.
Without in any way supporting this particular quack, I can tell you that the antiviral properties of ivermectin have been studied for a number of years. There are valid in-vitro studies with data to indicate its potential effectiveness against RNA viruses - and they are not at all to the prime-time stage of actual use in humans for this purpose. First came to my attention with West Nile Virus years ago (both scientific properties and the quacks extrapolating too much from them). Now, a quick google scholar search shows the results almost 100% around COVID studies. No surprise.
For more reading - Google scholar: Antiviral Ivermectin
Enter your email address to join: