BernardSmith
Senior Member
The other day Tom, (Pumpkinman) posted a really useful set of questions that novice wine makers might address when they post questions to this forum and this prompted some members of the forum to express concern about the complete lack of knowledge that undergirds some questions. In defense of these newbies let me offer this:
I don't make beer. I think I have made a few gallons perhaps twice in my life but the other day I was reading a classic book on beer making - The Home Brewers Companion (1994)- by a classic beer maker - Charlie Papazian. Here's what he has written on page 187
"Easily observable in glass fermenters, an apparent cessation of bubbles are accurate indications that your beer is ready to bottle....Hydrometer readings should be taken and recorded during the bottling process, but visual observation can serve well to indicate when the brew is ready to bottle."...
Papazian is basically saying that eyeballing the beer provides all the information that a good beer maker needs. He ends this paragraph by advising beer makers to use a hydrometer "until" they are "confident in making these judgments". So, the use of color and cessation of activity is what seasoned /expert beer makers are expected use to know when their brew is ready.
But we wouldn't begin to talk about our wines without reference to an hydrometer, and we would dismiss the idea that a lack of visible activity in an airlock has any significance. In other words, there appears to be quite different "ways of knowing" that beer makers use and wine makers use. And there may be other very different ways of knowing that folk who come to this forum for the first time use and their questions come from those other ways of knowing. We need to be sensitive to what I would call "folk" methods and folk ways of knowing even if our methods and our ways of knowing are quite different.
I don't make beer. I think I have made a few gallons perhaps twice in my life but the other day I was reading a classic book on beer making - The Home Brewers Companion (1994)- by a classic beer maker - Charlie Papazian. Here's what he has written on page 187
"Easily observable in glass fermenters, an apparent cessation of bubbles are accurate indications that your beer is ready to bottle....Hydrometer readings should be taken and recorded during the bottling process, but visual observation can serve well to indicate when the brew is ready to bottle."...
Papazian is basically saying that eyeballing the beer provides all the information that a good beer maker needs. He ends this paragraph by advising beer makers to use a hydrometer "until" they are "confident in making these judgments". So, the use of color and cessation of activity is what seasoned /expert beer makers are expected use to know when their brew is ready.
But we wouldn't begin to talk about our wines without reference to an hydrometer, and we would dismiss the idea that a lack of visible activity in an airlock has any significance. In other words, there appears to be quite different "ways of knowing" that beer makers use and wine makers use. And there may be other very different ways of knowing that folk who come to this forum for the first time use and their questions come from those other ways of knowing. We need to be sensitive to what I would call "folk" methods and folk ways of knowing even if our methods and our ways of knowing are quite different.