Have any of your containers tested positive for lead?Several years ago she learned about the possibility of lead so we now purchase lead testing swabs on amazon.
It makes sense. Since this one is a very old antique (actually was an old butter churn) I think I will avoid using it. I'm sure I will find something reasonably priced that will do the job.I made a quick search and found this page. My take from reading is unless you are 100% positive what is in the glaze, it's safer to not use it. I recommend using a product that you know is safe.
Let's not forget how far we have come in the last 75 years. We have gone through scares about cranberries. We watched the dairy industry flip-flop around on Wax Paper containers, then Plastic, then back to "New Wax free paper" now Non BPA plastic. Aluminum was a cause of Alzheimer's, now it's not. As kids we played with Mercury in our hands and coated coins with it - Now the shut down schools and call in hazmat teams if a forbidden mercury thermometer is broken or even found in the the school sometimes.
In the present day they say that Aluminum has not been connected to Alzheimer's but they say that you can detect a metallic taste if some high acid foods are cooking in aluminum cookware.
Lead - well that seems to remain on the bad boy list but the crazy thing is that it seems like every year we find out that China has shipped us yet another product with lead the leaches out into our food/beverage.
All that to say, sometimes when we try to save money we end up potentially endangering ourselves because sometimes we don't know what we don't know.
But we do know that lead is a real health hazard and we do know that mercury is toxic. We also know that PBA leaches and that at certain levels it is also a health hazard. But here's the thing. Science is not religion and science works through observation and hypothesis generation and testing and not through truth claims and beliefs. What we think we know today, we know with some certainty that tomorrow we may need to take into account what we don't know today. So every claim that scientists make is provisional. But provisional truths don't sell advertising in the media (whether online or on paper or TV) so journalists - who are not engaged in science but in writing stories that sell - present the provisional accounts offered by scientists as eye -catching stories: drinking red wine makes you live longer; aluminum causes dementia. But that is not what scientists - those people doing the observing, creating and testing hypotheses, said. Ever. The answer then is to go to the source. And that is a challenge not least because often those papers are written so that only fellow members of the guilds understand the language spoken. And the solution to that is that we all need to learn those occult (hidden) languages used OR those scientists need to learn to speak to people in their own languages or science journalists need to write stories that don't use "click bait" as if their readers are fish.Let's not forget how far we have come in the last 75 years. We have gone through scares about cranberries. We watched the dairy industry flip-flop around on Wax Paper containers, then Plastic, then back to "New Wax free paper" now Non BPA plastic. Aluminum was a cause of Alzheimer's, now it's not. As kids we played with Mercury in our hands and coated coins with it - Now the shut down schools and call in hazmat teams if a forbidden mercury thermometer is broken or even found in the the school sometimes.
In the present day they say that Aluminum has not been connected to Alzheimer's but they say that you can detect a metallic taste if some high acid foods are cooking in aluminum cookware.
Lead - well that seems to remain on the bad boy list but the crazy thing is that it seems like every year we find out that China has shipped us yet another product with lead the leaches out into our food/beverage.
All that to say, sometimes when we try to save money we end up potentially endangering ourselves because sometimes we don't know what we don't know.
But that is not what scientists - those people doing the observing, creating and testing hypotheses, said. Ever. The answer then is to go to the source. And that is a challenge not least because often those papers are written so that only fellow members of the guilds understand the language spoken. And the solution to that is that we all need to learn those occult (hidden) languages used OR those scientists need to learn to speak to people in their own languages or science journalists need to write stories that don't use "click bait" as if their readers are fish.
Enter your email address to join: