dcbrown73
Clueless Winemaker
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2016
- Messages
- 1,221
- Reaction score
- 905
I've been reading up on SO2 as I'm getting close to bottling my fruit wine and I just added 1/8 tsp of k-meta to my Shiraz, though I had no idea how much actually needed to be added. I was thinking it had been three months, but checking it had only been just over two.
So, I started reading up on the subject and then I see to get it right, I actually need to pH test also as they said the pH can determine if you need more or less k-meta and also they said you should test, then add the k-meta then test again a couple of days later as when you initially add the k-meta some of it may bind immediately (over a couple of days) which will then lower the k-meta ppm to a level lower than intended. Blah!
I decided, I needed to test k-meta and figured I might as well get a pH tester too. I was looking at the A/O test and figured that was the cheapest and accurate, but with the things saying i should test before and after adding the k-meta waiting 15 minutes each time is a lot of time and well. Time is a preimum commodity with it so I figured maybe I would just get the Vinmetrica SC-100 since it's much faster. I also needed a pH meter and looked at the Phep 5, but when I compared the price of the two it came somewhat close to the Vinmetrica SC-300 which also tests TA.
I am a little worried as some people love it, others question it. (and a high price tag) With the price so and getting the TA test and I'm hoping to keep this hobby long term, I took the plunge and ordered the Vinmetrica SC-300. I hope it doesn't come back to burn me.
Does anyone else here have any thoughts on it? I think even with the high price tag, if it can really improve my winemaking results, it should more than pay for itself providing it works and I don't have to replace the probe a lot. (I plan to take the best care of it I can!)
So, I started reading up on the subject and then I see to get it right, I actually need to pH test also as they said the pH can determine if you need more or less k-meta and also they said you should test, then add the k-meta then test again a couple of days later as when you initially add the k-meta some of it may bind immediately (over a couple of days) which will then lower the k-meta ppm to a level lower than intended. Blah!
I decided, I needed to test k-meta and figured I might as well get a pH tester too. I was looking at the A/O test and figured that was the cheapest and accurate, but with the things saying i should test before and after adding the k-meta waiting 15 minutes each time is a lot of time and well. Time is a preimum commodity with it so I figured maybe I would just get the Vinmetrica SC-100 since it's much faster. I also needed a pH meter and looked at the Phep 5, but when I compared the price of the two it came somewhat close to the Vinmetrica SC-300 which also tests TA.
I am a little worried as some people love it, others question it. (and a high price tag) With the price so and getting the TA test and I'm hoping to keep this hobby long term, I took the plunge and ordered the Vinmetrica SC-300. I hope it doesn't come back to burn me.
Does anyone else here have any thoughts on it? I think even with the high price tag, if it can really improve my winemaking results, it should more than pay for itself providing it works and I don't have to replace the probe a lot. (I plan to take the best care of it I can!)