reeflections
Senior Member
@reeflections, your idea has a lot of merit, although I did it the opposite. I found a recipe for rhubarb wine in the local newspaper and started with the art, then later moved to hard science, and gravitated towards the middle ground. I orbit that center, and my opinions vary a bit as I learn new things. Years ago I imagine people started on the art side, but with the internet and availability of information, I suspect many are starting on the science side.
As @MustyMike said above, large vendors have the resources to blend and tweak to make consistent batches from year to year. If you're a plonk vendor (I'm not British, but that word sounds right) making non-vintage wine, you have a vested interest in consistency. If you're Chateau Petrus, you have a vested interest in making the best wine you can from that year's harvest.
I'm on the Petrus side, philosophically speaking. I'm strive to make the best wine I can from what I have. Sure, I'd like next year's wine to be like a favored batch from the past, but I don't honestly worry about it. All I can do is my best. Mother Nature handles the rest.
IMO the science side is risk management. I control the factors that I consider important so the yeast can do its thing.
I think even with a recipe there is some very basic science that is necessary to understand. What yeast does and needs to do its work, range of temperatures, maybe S.G. readings, sanitizing. etc..
Basically, I think I am growing into the same philosophy as you as I learn.
I am using recipes but I have already tweaked them some. I have never used a kit and doubt I ever will. They seem pretty expensive. Plus, my 1st stab at fermentation was about 20 years ago when I made a couple of kit beers. They turned out good but I never felt like I really made them, more like I just put them together like an Ikea desk. But as Dawg says, all ways are right.
Last edited: