Yeah, I understand. Please don't think I'm trying to be disagreeable, just trying to understand where you're coming from and how to possibly modify what I was planning. Absolutely always looking for advice and critiques!
So my plan #2 was for 8# per gallon, for 16# total for 2 gallons. Then I was plotting an f-pac of 4#, to equal roughly 10# per gallon. I do realize that that would be diluting the alcohol, but it should enhance everything else, right? Is there any problem with that? Let's assume I would be fortifying anyway, (which with a port, I would be). Wouldn't I just need a bit more alcohol? I suppose that that in itself would dilute the flavors a bit, if I needed to add more alcohol. Though, with 190 proof Everclear, I can't imagine that the difference would be that great. Any thoughts?
So you said you typically skip the f-pac for a port? I recall Jobe doing some testing on that, and he seemed to think that it was the best way to sweeten it back up after the fact. I guess this is due to some of the flavors burning off during fermentation?
So if Turock uses 10-12# per gallon with no water, I guess it seems like 8# would be almost entirely no water. Unless I'm misunderstanding. In fact it seems like if I followed the recipe, I would be ending up with more than what they claim if I added that much water to the juice that Turock suggests I will have. Hrm.
So, I could do a few things. I could try and up the berries a bit, maybe to 10#, with another 2#/gal for f-pac. I could add them all at once, but Jobe's posts made it sound like you really needed to add some juice back to give it a rich flavor. I could alternatively try and just increase to 3-gal, like was mentioned. Either one will hurt my bank account a bit, but sacrificing the quality of a wine that will be a significant investment of time,etc. just isn't worth it. So, any thoughts on all that?