Coastal dwellers take note!

Winemaking Talk - Winemaking Forum

Help Support Winemaking Talk - Winemaking Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

jswordy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
10,831
Reaction score
41,137
CHARLESTON, S.C. -- An experiment in the age-old art of winemaking began on Wednesday as a California winery submerged four cases of cabernet sauvignon in Charleston Harbor to see how the ocean affects the aging of the wine.

http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/food/ci_22672779/us-winery-experiments-aging-wine-ocean

and

http://www.latimes.com/business/mon...nery-ages-wine-ocean-20130220,0,1078228.story

Marketing at work? :h

Who will be our first coastal member to try this and report back on the results?

And last, if I fill my bathtub with Epsom salts and water and dump in my wine bottles, would that be the same thing? :D

Under edit: For Facebook fans, follow the winery and see interesting discussions at www.facebook.com/MiraWinery
 
Last edited:
?

And last, if I fill my bathtub with Epsom salts and water and dump in my wine bottles, would that be the same thing? :D

Yep would work just fine til Saturday nite which everybody knows is bath time in Alabama. Guess you will just have to drink it then. LOL, Arne.:i
 
I think the whole idea is a bunch of malarkey - just a way to get some press. But it made me wonder; does anyone know why they really chose Charleston Harbor rather than the Pacific coast?

The article states, "Charleston Harbor was selected for the experiment because Dyke is from Charleston and because the city is increasingly known for its fine dining. 'With our southern roots in Charleston and Charleston being an historic location what better place to do this?' Dyke asked." That sounds more like marketing than science.
 
Last edited:
I would think the water in that harbor is too warm for long term storage. San Francisco Bay is probably much better - and the sharks would keep the riff-raff out!
 
I would think the water in that harbor is too warm for long term storage. San Francisco Bay is probably much better - and the sharks would keep the riff-raff out!

They will only be there for three months, and that water can be quite cool, though they have chosen to not disclose the depth at which the wine is being kept at. I wonder what type of permit they needed to do something like this?
 
I would think the water in that harbor is too warm for long term storage. San Francisco Bay is probably much better - and the sharks would keep the riff-raff out!

This thought just tickled me. Bunch of drunken sharks swimmin around bitin everything in sight. LOL, Arne.
 
Back
Top