MLF and kits

Winemaking Talk - Winemaking Forum

Help Support Winemaking Talk - Winemaking Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

BernardSmith

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
2,541
Location
Saratoga Springs
I have just begun to make a first batch of wine using fresh grapes. I have made only a couple of kits (I make country wines and mead , not grape wines) and I wonder why kits don't include any instructions for malolactic fermentation. More to the point: why don't kits acknowledge MLF? Is it unlikely that MLF will spontaneously occur in the bottle... OR is it that the way that the juice is prepared all MLF bacteria that are naturally on the grapes have been killed?
 
I think kits are made so that any high school, school girl can make a pretty good wine with little previous experience.

We all know there are many ways to change up these kits, improve upon many aspects of these kits... they are foolproof, like putting together a model airplane. they go middle of the road ingredients that will make a wine with very little help from you. A great place for a beginner to start.
 
Not argueing or questioning about the balance etc of kits. I take that as a given but my question is really about why MLF does not often or sometimes spontaneously occur. When you make wine from whole or frozen grapes you need to be prepared for spontaneous MLF - or you need to control the MLF by inoculating the wine with lab cultured bacteria. Is it that the kit manufacturers have removed all MLF bacteria as they prepare the kit or is it that the instructions to add K-meta at the stages when given kill the bacteria or what?
 
Not argueing or questioning about the balance etc of kits. I take that as a given but my question is really about why MLF does not often or sometimes spontaneously occur. When you make wine from whole or frozen grapes you need to be prepared for spontaneous MLF - or you need to control the MLF by inoculating the wine with lab cultured bacteria. Is it that the kit manufacturers have removed all MLF bacteria as they prepare the kit or is it that the instructions to add K-meta at the stages when given kill the bacteria or what?

The juice you get in a kit is rendered inert in some fashion or another, whether it is pasteurized or sterilized, I have no idea. Malolactic bacteria and yeast are not present in the product as they are on grapes that come from the vineyard, so the odds of alcoholic fermentation or MLF starting up on its own are slim to none, otherwise, the product would have no shelf life. The sulfite that we add to the wine after AF is further insurance that MLF won't kick off spontaneously, even the most sulfite hardy strains can't handle levels above 50 ppm.

Furthermore, most kits furnish potassium sorbate to be added, this additive in the presence of active MLF will produce the flavor / aroma of geraniums and will ruin your wine unrecoverably.

And, as has been purported here numerous times, these kits are balance by adding malic acid, man made acid, not the same malic acid that occurs naturally in grapes, and MLB have no effect in converting this acid to lactic acid. Performing MLF may convert some of the malic, the naturally occurring portion, but none of the artificial portion will be converted.

All that said, I've stored kit wines in barrels that have MLB in them from grape batches, no sorbate added to the kit wine, with no noticeable effects. Running chromotography side by side with grape wines in other MLB laden barrels confirmed that all of the malic in the grape wines was converted, while the kit wine still exhibited a large malic spot on the chromotography paper. So what's the point??????????
 
Not argueing or questioning about the balance etc of kits. I take that as a given but my question is really about why MLF does not often or sometimes spontaneously occur. When you make wine from whole or frozen grapes you need to be prepared for spontaneous MLF - or you need to control the MLF by inoculating the wine with lab cultured bacteria. Is it that the kit manufacturers have removed all MLF bacteria as they prepare the kit or is it that the instructions to add K-meta at the stages when given kill the bacteria or what?

Ah, I see.

I think kits don't acknowledge it because it would be very, very unlikely to occur spontaneously. As you point out, their directed K-meta additions would suppress any MLB, and it is not like most kitmaker's environments are teeming with MLB to begin with.
 
The juice you get in a kit is rendered inert in some fashion or another, whether it is pasteurized or sterilized, I have no idea. Malolactic bacteria and yeast are not present in the product as they are on grapes that come from the vineyard, so the odds of alcoholic fermentation or MLF starting up on its own are slim to none, otherwise, the product would have no shelf life. The sulfite that we add to the wine after AF is further insurance that MLF won't kick off spontaneously, even the most sulfite hardy strains can't handle levels above 50 ppm.

Furthermore, most kits furnish potassium sorbate to be added, this additive in the presence of active MLF will produce the flavor / aroma of geraniums and will ruin your wine unrecoverably.

And, as has been purported here numerous times, these kits are balance by adding malic acid, man made acid, not the same malic acid that occurs naturally in grapes, and MLB have no effect in converting this acid to lactic acid. Performing MLF may convert some of the malic, the naturally occurring portion, but none of the artificial portion will be converted.

All that said, I've stored kit wines in barrels that have MLB in them from grape batches, no sorbate added to the kit wine, with no noticeable effects. Running chromotography side by side with grape wines in other MLB laden barrels confirmed that all of the malic in the grape wines was converted, while the kit wine still exhibited a large malic spot on the chromotography paper. So what's the point??????????

The point wasn't that I thought kits SHOULD push for MLF but was why MLF never occurred spontaneously in bottles and so the answers seem to confirm that MLF won't occur spontaneously with kits because a) the juice has no bacteria; b) the kit maker is asked to sulfite before any volunteer bacteria might get a toehold and c) much of the malic is not fermentable anyway by the bacteria. and d) even if naturally occuring malic was present then kits that ask the maker to add K-sorbate would soon be stockpiled as garbage because of the off aromas that would develop.
 
The point wasn't that I thought kits SHOULD push for MLF but was why MLF never occurred spontaneously in bottles and so the answers seem to confirm that MLF won't occur spontaneously with kits because a) the juice has no bacteria; b) the kit maker is asked to sulfite before any volunteer bacteria might get a toehold and c) much of the malic is not fermentable anyway by the bacteria. and d) even if naturally occuring malic was present then kits that ask the maker to add K-sorbate would soon be stockpiled as garbage because of the off aromas that would develop.

Yes, I agree with your summary. I apologize for misinterpreting the intent of your original post.
 
Has any one who've made kits before have deviated from the instructions? Like letting the wine sit more than the 10 days recommended before bottling? It's my first kit, a Chardonnay, gift. I usually make reds from juice.
 
@Mario Dinis, there are different theories on bulk aging, one of which is that wine goes through a lot of chemical changes during the first 6 to 12 months, so bulk aging longer means the individual bottles will be more consistent. Another theory is that the wine will age longer if you don't bottle it soon -- this theory is hard to disprove. ;)

I was not sold on the chemical changing theory, but as time goes on I'm leaning towards it being correct, or at least not wrong. I keep a quote from Mohammed Ali in mind: A man who views the world at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life. Learning new things and changing opinions based upon new knowledge is a good thing!

During fermentation ignore the time frames in the kit instructions. Your hydrometer tells you when fermentation is done, not the calendar.

Post fermentation, treat the durations in the instruction as minimum values, e.g., 2 weeks means "at least 2 weeks". I typically bottle kits after 3 to 4 months, although if I add aging oak that duration may double. In general, I bottle whites and lighter reds sooner, as they are typically drinkable sooner. Heavier reds, especially if I add aging oak, bulk age longer.

I suggest you experiment, trying different durations to see what you like. An interesting experiment is to buy 2 of the same kit -- bulk age one for 3 months and the other for 9 or 12. Open a bottle of each every 3 months after the 2nd is bottled to see how they compare.
 
@Mario Dinis, there are different theories on bulk aging, one of which is that wine goes through a lot of chemical changes during the first 6 to 12 months, so bulk aging longer means the individual bottles will be more consistent. Another theory is that the wine will age longer if you don't bottle it soon -- this theory is hard to disprove. ;)

I was not sold on the chemical changing theory, but as time goes on I'm leaning towards it being correct, or at least not wrong. I keep a quote from Mohammed Ali in mind: A man who views the world at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life. Learning new things and changing opinions based upon new knowledge is a good thing!

During fermentation ignore the time frames in the kit instructions. Your hydrometer tells you when fermentation is done, not the calendar.

Post fermentation, treat the durations in the instruction as minimum values, e.g., 2 weeks means "at least 2 weeks". I typically bottle kits after 3 to 4 months, although if I add aging oak that duration may double. In general, I bottle whites and lighter reds sooner, as they are typically drinkable sooner. Heavier reds, especially if I add aging oak, bulk age longer.

I suggest you experiment, trying different durations to see what you like. An interesting experiment is to buy 2 of the same kit -- bulk age one for 3 months and the other for 9 or 12. Open a bottle of each every 3 months after the 2nd is bottled to see how they compare.
Absolutely right. I've never made a kit before and when I read the instructions I found too "calendary". I usually age my wines in bulk for an average of six months. First time making a white.
 
I read the instructions I found too "calendary".
Agreed. Kit instructions are designed for a total newbie to successfully make wine on the first try with no help. In that respect, the ones I'm familiar with (Winexpert and RJ Spagnols) are great. Not optimal to experienced winemakers, but great for newbies.

I'm happy when I see a post that reads, "I want to make wine and am researching it first." Those folks, if they listen to good advice, typically have good first batches.
 
I also let the SG and lack of fermentation (using a water lock) govern when to start racking the wine from the primary. Then bulk age for at least 6 months in the carboy. I have done some bulk aging for a year, but haven’t done any longer than that. Agree that bulk aging results in more consistency between bottles. I do this with reds and whites, but not with Rose‘ as that gets consumed quickly during the Spring and Summer here in a texas.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top