Somm!

Winemaking Talk - Winemaking Forum

Help Support Winemaking Talk - Winemaking Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Elmer

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
1,845
Reaction score
448
So last night while the boss was out of town I watched a documentary streaming on netflix.
Somm.
This is about a group of people who are attempting to pass the master sommelier exam. I believe worldwide there is less than 200 master sommeliers.

I found this documentary fascinating, they approach wine in ways I cant and maybe wont.
When they taste a wine they throw out atleast 6 to 12 different taste indicators, among my favorite:

"crushed Hillside" :slp
"Grandma's purse" :slp
"freshly opened can of tennis balls” :slp
and “freshly cut garden hose” :slp

but seriously, who smells a freshly cut garden hose?
And who cuts garden hoses?

I will give them exceptional credit for thier study of regions. They have to know every wine region by name and be able to identify flavors specific to that region, which is why they can blindly taste and identify wines.

However, I can not decide if being a master Sommelier is talent or pretentiousness!

as I was watching I was was drinking a homemade -Cab Franc vintage 2013.
I swirled, sniffed, tasted.
Then I swirled, sniffed, tasted.

I tasted wine.
Where the frack is the taste of the inside of a closet?
But nothing, I tasted wine, dry red, with a hint of red wine!

But regardless, give a documentary a watch it is interesting!
 
I watched it also...But you have to remember they did not taste fruit wines.
Only grape wines...I guess it is because the lowly fruit wine is not considered to be in the same class as a grape wine.
I do not know what even makes a great wine...
For me, its the taste...soft on the palate and the taste of the fruit its made from.
I can not get a grape taste out of a grape wine..But its me.
I dont taste moms old shoes, are dads old shirt, are the drops of dew on the grass....are the salt from a sand dune at early morning.
Bull**** To Me
Sorry guys...I just cant get it...
I make what I like to taste and enjoy, regardless of the hype.
 
It is all a matter of taste and, personally, I don't care what a wine tastes like to an "expert." I only care what the wine tastes like to me. If I like it, it is "good" wine, if I don't it is "not so good" wine. Similarly, nothing, and I mean NOTHING, would ever allow me to see in a Picasso painting anything but an artist slathering paint on a canvas and laughing to himself at the gullibility of the public. I don't think I have ever seen "a Picasso" except in photographs or on television nor have I tasted a $2000 bottle of wine. Had I done so, in either case, I am sure my life would not have been affected one iota in either direction.
 
I am not hijacking this thread. Honestly, I am not, but I don't think Picasso "slathered" paint on any canvas. Perhaps his most famous work (certainly in Europe if not the USA) is Guernica and I don't know anyone who has looked at this painting and not felt the pain of people trapped in war. But to return to "crushed hillsides" and "grannie's purse" I don't know if I agree with the purple language but I do see what is being offered here. If you want to tell someone what color you see in the sky right now , right here, "blue" is not very informative. If you want to tell someone what aromas you smell in a freesia, what vocabulary, what words do you have? We tend not to have a richly developed vocabulary for smell or taste. James (Sorry to call you out, James) tastes apricots when he makes apricot wine or blueberries when he makes blueberry wine.. and that is fine. Perhaps for James and 300,000,000 other US residents apples are apples are apples... but what happens if you are asked to taste a granny smith and then a Jona gold and then a cox's orange pippin. All apples. But they don't taste the same. How do you tell me (or anyone) what you taste when you taste a cox's orange pippin? How does THAT apple taste different from a granny smith? Those sommeliers are (I think) simply trying to create and use a vocabulary that "captures" tastes and smells for which we simply do not have an everyday vocabulary. For colors we tend to have a richer vocabulary (grey or gray? duck egg blue or duck egg green, aqua or turquoise? ) but for tastes and aromas we are vocabulary poor. So what do folk (sommeliers, wine makers) who work with and depend on their ability to discern incredibly fine differences in taste and smell, do ? They make up an argot of words and phrases that they use to communicate. And when we overhear their chatter we burst out laughing. But perhaps we would snort less if their language seemed less... pretentious

http://www.pablopicasso.org/guernica.jsp
 
To be honest...If i ferment 3 different apples the exact same way, with the same yeast, same abv, etc..I probably could not tell the difference in the glass.
I can tell the difference between said fruits, as blackberry to apple when blindfolded.
I can not tell the difference in a blackberry from Texas as opposed to one from Louisiana are Argentina, are Kansas.
 
I think taste is personal and individual.
Regardless if it is wine, apples or art.
My wife likes that very tart green apples. I like a fuji.
She likes fluffly rom/coms, I like watching baseball and football.

Anyway. I look a Picasso and I see art. I see the gift of someone who can paint and brush strokes. I have never been able to feel anger or remorse in a painting. But I see the beauty of the art and effort and talent of the artisan.
Even the new avant garde paiting, I appreciate the effort I just cant feel the artists "pain" through the painting!

Wine wise, I dont doubt that there are people who can taste things that we can not and express it accordingly.

for example, my wife can not taste the plum, oak, smokeyness, peppers or leathery notes that are common in many different wines.
She a poor ability to taste. but she knows what she likes.

What I find pretentious is applying a label that would be more individual than generic.

"Pepper" or "vanilla" we all know the taste.
"newly upholstered couch" varies depending on the person.

When I taste a wine tell me what is there. Fruits, chocolates, peppers, leathers, dark, light, strong etc....
NO hillsides!

but then again I am only refined enough so my blue collar friends can shun me for it!
 
Most of these people have hyper sensitive palates and can detect these aromas. I myself can do the same thing with just about any food or drink. Cheers
 
I guess, I am not refined, are have a hyper sensitive palate..
No matter what...It all taste like chicken.
 
Most of these people have hyper sensitive palates and can detect these aromas. I myself can do the same thing with just about any food or drink. Cheers


Just to expand on this..

The story is this. These few 200 people that are masters have a pallet that is freakishly complex. The idea is that they can detect more flavor components than the average human.

In short, they have mutant tongues.

Now this being true or not is up to debate.
 
No Response????

Honestly????

I use a term like "Mutant tongue" and 10 minutes goes by with no follow up jokes???

I am shocked!!!!!
 
I guess, I am not refined, are have a hyper sensitive palate..
No matter what...It all taste like chicken.

I guess where and when we think it is significant and important we have good palates for the purposes at hand (as we sociologists are wont to say), but for the most part our purposes at hand don't require we pay very much attention to differences in taste and smell. (it's like the fellow who says that all reds are red - rust, orange, pink, crimson, blood) The difference is in what we ask our palates to do and whether we work hard to disable our palate's ability to detect fine differences or whether we work hard to enhance its capabilities. I have no idea whether blueberries shipped from different parts of the US taste different, but I do know that different varieties of ripe blueberries or ripe strawberries picked locally do taste very different.
 
No Response????

Honestly????

I use a term like "Mutant tongue" and 10 minutes goes by with no follow up jokes???

I am shocked!!!!!

Sorry,
I was stuck in a statewide conference call for close to 2 hours!

But that very well maybe the best two word to ever be placed side by side!
"Mutant tongue"

And it is darn fun to say!
 
I personnaly can taste many of the less exotic flavours that are talked about in wine tasting. Ie, pepper, leather, chocolate, mineralness, florals, tofee, earthy, melon/honeydew, peachyness, smoke,berry,darkfruit..ect

All of these flavours are not exactly what you would associate with "grape" but if you taste for them you can learn to look for them and eventually be able to find them in your wine without first inspecting the label. In fact, I have been practicing by first buying a wine, or whiskie and then tasting coming up with on the fly taste notes and then following up with taste reviews from professionals about that specific wine/whiskie.

Usually I do pretty good at finding the more basic taste I have mentioned, but I do not think I could find back side of grandma's panties if I even knew what to look for.
 
"I look (at) a Picasso and I see art. I see the gift of someone who can paint and brush strokes. I have never been able to feel anger or remorse in a painting. But I see the beauty of the art and effort and talent of the artisan."

Yeah, Elmer, I see what you mean. I should have saved some of my grandsons' work from kindergarten. Who know?... :)

picasso_woman_b.jpg
picasso24.jpg
 
I watched this movie on Netflix last night and found it very interesting. I think these people can actually train their tongue to taste certain things. Or should I say that the taste is always there but they learn how to distinguish certain characteristics and have names associated with them. It appeared to me from the movie that this comes from extensive study and training. Doing blind wine tastings and trying to guess the region that produced it. It is amazing that they are often able to "call" the wine correctly. I never would care to be at this level of wine tasting but after watching I think it may be fun to try some of those blind tastings.
 
The power of suggestion is ever-so-evident in wine tasting. We all know what we like and gravitate to it, but thankfully we are also wise enough not to limit our experience. Trying other wines is a good thing, enhanced by what we are told should be the predominant "palate and nose". So many ways to be content!!!
 
I watched this movie on Netflix last night and found it very interesting. I think these people can actually train their tongue to taste certain things. Or should I say that the taste is always there but they learn how to distinguish certain characteristics and have names associated with them. It appeared to me from the movie that this comes from extensive study and training. Doing blind wine tastings and trying to guess the region that produced it. It is amazing that they are often able to "call" the wine correctly. I never would care to be at this level of wine tasting but after watching I think it may be fun to try some of those blind tastings.

I think it would be alot of fun to get to blindly taste some of the wines these people tried.

Of course I can not tell the difference between a Napa Pinot Noir and a New Zealand Pinot.

That is that part I found fascinating. The study of the regions, the climates, the soil, the elevation.
Taking that info and being able to taste a wine and know that a certian soil, which produces a grape is associated with the flavor of the wine.

The tracing of the maps and flashcards were/are something I could not do.

I also do not recall that anyone in the movie made bad remarks about any wine!

but missing from the entire movie, was someone simply saying that all tastes and prefences are individual!
:se
 
Back
Top