Rock..i don't think i know you before today...maybe under another name? if i offended you before this exchange in some way...tell me what it was...since i dont know...
i am not sure what the dig is about...i dont recall trying to enforce upon you that you have to alter your wine making techniques.....
did you take the time to read the article that Running Wolf shared? Aftre this passage:
"The true perversion, however, took place back in Australia, where Philips convinced a cadre of winemakers to age some of their most promising juice in used whiskey barrels, sourced from Julian Van Winkle, proprietor of the Pappy Van Winkle Distillery in Kentucky. (Before those charred oak barrels held wine for eighteen months, whiskey slept in that same wood for twenty years.)"
came THIS:
“We work with winemakers I consider to be some of the most open-minded and innovative in the world,” Philips told me. “But, at first, they flat refused to do it. The wine business is very codified, and the peer pressure to conform is very intense. The French way is always better, and French oak is always better. And here I was asking them to use American oak barrels. Super-steroidal American oak barrels that smell of whiskey. It just isn’t done.”
Philips won the argument, and eventually fifteen hundred cases of Southern Belle Shiraz were on their way from Australia to America. Those $25 bottles should be in stores by the end of 2009.
I recently drank an early-release bottle. It was a heady, fruit-driven bomb of a wine, with a nose full of vanilla and a spine cobbled out of post oak. It was a wine that defied the dictates of terroir and tradition and begged for a rack of ribs. When I told Philips as much, he said, “I’ve always thought there’s more of an affinity between the American South and Australia than there is between the American South and the American North. The winemakers feel it; I feel it.” Now you’ll get to taste it.