Okay, you shamed me into it. I had been hoping to find and rate the missing labels before I posted again. But here is my interim report on the four mentioned above. I use a 20-point scale to rate wines.
The winner, BY FAR, was Louis M. Martini. (2011), $13 on sale. I gave it 17 points (which is about as high as I give almost anything south of Opus 1.) Here are my amateur tasting notes:
Upon opening: Color: Deeep purple! Languid, velvet, raspberry cake, round, mild, smooth. Almost like drinking a kringle. Boysenberry.
2nd night: Languid, smooth, floral, toffee finish, blackberry, black cherry.
-----------------------------------
Carnivor ($10): this was a disappointment in some respect. It seems like it was "doctored." I gave it 13. Tasting notes (verbatim):
Upon opening: Smooth, languid, cough syrup, boysenberry, artificial candy taste, slightly sweet. Bizarre deep purple color, nearly fluorescent. Loooooong legs. The legs themselves look purple. Very viscous. Artificial color and/or glycerol.
(Didn't make it to second night! The few drops of wine left in the glass to dry looked like day-glo purple the next day.)
-----------------------------------
Liberty School (2010), $16. I gave it a 15 the first night, plummeting to a 12 the second night.
Upon opening: Very nice, astringent, (Would be MUCH better in 5 years), smooth, fills the mouth, berry, spice, dry, cassis, floral.
2nd night: tart, lemon, berry, cedar, leather, lemongrass.
-----------------------------------
Rodney Strong (2011) $15: another disappointment. I gave it a 13 1st night and 12 second night.
Upon opening: tart, smoothish, astringent, acidic, blackberry, slight mineral note, pleasant finish
2nd night: smooth, tart, slightly astringent, toffee/coffee finish, figs.
I was out to dinner at an unfamiliar restaurant, and they had Louis Martini by the glass. Knowing this result, I jumped on that, and it did not disappoint. Just as good as I remembered it. Thinking about adding Louis Martini to the "house rotation!"