Conclusion...
Here we are at the end of our tale of two clearing agents. The two batches have both been in their bottles for over a week, so last night, my lovely wife and I sat down to check them out. From the looks alone, the two wines appear identical. They are both perfectly clear with no added sediments having fallen out in the bottle. As the official Dragon Blood inspector, I declair they both pass the muster for awesome
red color (it is called "Blood" after all).
Batch
A left, Batch
B right:
I opened both of the bottles and observed no sign of carbonation (phew!), which would have made comparison difficult if not impossible. I poured a small amount in two glasses and gave them a sniff...!!!
<Remember, I currently have no way to do any testing on these wines except with my senses. I understood this from the beginning, and decided to proceed, using only my taste, smell, and observation to judge the outcome. That's what wine judges do, right?>
Now, here comes the strange part. I fully expected at this point that the wines would come out exactly the same in all aspects, except for the handling of the respective sediments and their densities at racking time (as we discussed earlier this month). What I got was a shock! Batch
A (bentonkite and Sparkolloid) had a distinct and shark nose (my wife called it a "tang") with a nice berry aroma, while Batch
B (Sparkolloid only) smelled just like a bowl of fresh berries---with a mild lemon twist. To be more specific, Batch
B smelled better, and more to my liking. It was what I had made Dragon Blood to be.
The aromas tranfered directly to the flavor. Upon tasting, we discovered that Batch
B was
true Dragon Blood. Slightly sweet, with full of rich berry flavor, and a perfect lemon background; all flavors nicely blended, wonderfully balanced. This is my sixth and seventh batches of this wine, so believe me, I know what it should taste like. Batch
A tasted out of balance...somehow. It was too tart---still clinging to it's youth perhaps. Before I commented on it at all, Johnna asked me if I had added more lemon juice to Batch
A. I told her they were exactly the same, except for the use of bentonite in the primary of Batch
A. Later that evening---as I do every evening---I asked Johnna what she wanted from the cellar. She had apparently wetted her tasted for Dragon Blood earlier, because she asked for more. She said, "Batch
B,
not Batch
A." She is so wise.
I had to agree.
That settled it for me.
I will not be using the bentonite in my Dragon Blood again. I suspect (and I may be completely wrong) that the bentonite may have interfered with the interaction of the yeast on the skins of the fruit---thus limiting or reducing the berry flavor in Batch
A. This goes right along with the preferred usage of bentonite in white wines, where skins are not present in the primary. Since rogue sediments are easier to see in white wines, it would seem very important to be able to rack efficiently off the sediments (which would be more compact with the heavier bentonite) and thus keep your whites clear.
My final (and certainly unprofessional) conclusion is that bentonite may in fact be detrimental in the crafting of wines involving skins (of fruits or grapes) in the primary.
Note: I will continue comparing these wines as time goes by. I plan to wait a few months and open two more bottles to see if they have improved or even out with age.
I want to thank everyone for the great input and questions. I appreciate all of you!