With overnight starters I get a faster ferment.
But, upon reflection, do I? An overnight starter gives the yeast a larger critical mass, so it can dominate the must quicker. A large part of the reproduction is done in an environment that is more to the yeast's liking.
Without a starter, it typically takes a day to notice fermentation, and another day (or two) for it to get vigorous. So what seems like a longer ferment may actually more a longer soak.
I've learned to like a colder ferment, as I do get more aroma. Reds can be too fruity for my liking, but barrel aging dampens that.
Last fall I left the reds in the fermenter for 2 weeks, so I had a short EM. Great for color and tannin, although I use Color Pro so color and tannin are good, anyway.
I'm just spitting out facts/ideas. I haven't conducted qualitative tests to determine if one method is actually better than another.
Yup, totally agree. My wine journey took me from dry pitching yeast, warm water hydration, starting with sugar, making a super starter (tempering in must), then to overnight starters with a pinch of DAP. Every one increased faster and faster fermentation. The odd thing was, the quality of wine did not get better.
Only when I had a several failed batches, re-assessing all of my methods, and starting from square 1, did I realize I was giving yeast what they wanted and not what they >needed<.
The beginning of choosing a fast or slow ferment starts with the yeast. Giving yeast what they need determines the character of the end product, something that I neglected to realize before my methods re-vamp. Specifically, "Sterols are the nutrient the yeast can most benefit from during rehydration. As a result, rehydrating an ADY with yeast autolysates rich in sterols, increases the fermentation activity and vitality, not only at the early stages but also during fermentation, and particularly at the end, when alcohol levels become toxic for the yeasts."
Quote taken from:
https://admin.lallemandwine.com/wp-...ds-are-useful-during-yeast-rehydration_EN.pdf
Yes, overnight starters provide a faster start up, but to what benefit? Time to completion, quality of wine, or both?
So, is Lallemand stating facts based on their years of research, or starting a rumor on a fictitious product?
To quote Bryan, "I'm just spitting out facts/ideas"....and I HAVE done qualitative tests to determine which method is "better". Hydrating yeasts with GoFerm Sterol-Flash makes a superior wine and takes about 15 to 20 minutes, versus overnight. Depending on must temperature, AF is usually 8 to 12 hours after pitch.
All the best,
Barry