Bartman
Senior Member
Having been on this and FVW's forum for 3+ years, I have noticed a strong tendency for posters (beginners and veterans) to focus far more on 'fantastic' results and unexpected triumphs, whether in the course of experiments, following mistakes or purely by accident, rather than talk about the crushing and disappointing 'defeats' or mediocre results. On the other hand, many of us have more or less negative views of most commercial wines, so it's not as if we all love every wine - good, bad or ugly. While I would certainly prefer a good result to a bad one if it was my wine, we all learn more from mistakes and negative consequences (e.g., undrinkable wine) than from success, especially if the success was inadvertent, right?
Since this is a forum intended to assist, 'teach' and share knowledge among the members, why do we (including myself) seem unwilling or disinclined to discuss the errors we have made and the impacts those have, including the occasionally horrendous aftermath? Are we all just so good at wine-making that only a tiny fraction of batches made turn out poorly, or is wine inherently that forgiving of our mistakes? Is it because the 'fruit of your labor' always tastes better than it would if it was store-bought?
Since the first kit I made, which was fizzy because it was under-degassed and not aged, I have not had any wine I was truly disappointed by, although a few I had higher hopes for (a Riesling that I added diced green apples to post-ferment that never took on that flavor, etc.), and folks that have tasted those wines have always been mildly positive to ecstatic (the only unopened bottle ever returned to me was from a batch that had been voted the best red among our local wine-making group a few weeks earlier - just goes to show how much tastes/opinions can vary).
So, are we just that *good*, or is it simply human nature to dwell on the positive and ignore or forget the negative?
Since this is a forum intended to assist, 'teach' and share knowledge among the members, why do we (including myself) seem unwilling or disinclined to discuss the errors we have made and the impacts those have, including the occasionally horrendous aftermath? Are we all just so good at wine-making that only a tiny fraction of batches made turn out poorly, or is wine inherently that forgiving of our mistakes? Is it because the 'fruit of your labor' always tastes better than it would if it was store-bought?
Since the first kit I made, which was fizzy because it was under-degassed and not aged, I have not had any wine I was truly disappointed by, although a few I had higher hopes for (a Riesling that I added diced green apples to post-ferment that never took on that flavor, etc.), and folks that have tasted those wines have always been mildly positive to ecstatic (the only unopened bottle ever returned to me was from a batch that had been voted the best red among our local wine-making group a few weeks earlier - just goes to show how much tastes/opinions can vary).
So, are we just that *good*, or is it simply human nature to dwell on the positive and ignore or forget the negative?