I’ve found that there are two types of winemakers. Ones that have a regiment that they stick to regardless of the situation and ones that whose baseline is do nothing and only do things based on the situation. I’ll explain.
Winemaker #1 - Wants the wine to be dictated by the grapes. The belief is the ideal wine is to do nothing. Only when the grape dictates it needs something will the winemaker make an addition. If commercial yeast and mlb are used, they are carefully selected to compliment the grape. Oak is only a background accent and not perceptible. Any blending is done to round the corners of the wine, not to change its direction.
Winemaker #2 - Wants the wine to be what they make it. Regardless of the varietal, shape of grapes, what the desired end result, will use 50ppm SO2 preferment, fermK, same yeast, same mlb, an enzyme every ferment, always sacrificial oak chips, saignee for good measure and their favorite oak: heavy toast French…you get the idea.
Certainly there is a spectrum and I’d say most are in between these two extremes. On a Scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being winemaker #2, where do you stand?
Winemaker #1 - Wants the wine to be dictated by the grapes. The belief is the ideal wine is to do nothing. Only when the grape dictates it needs something will the winemaker make an addition. If commercial yeast and mlb are used, they are carefully selected to compliment the grape. Oak is only a background accent and not perceptible. Any blending is done to round the corners of the wine, not to change its direction.
Winemaker #2 - Wants the wine to be what they make it. Regardless of the varietal, shape of grapes, what the desired end result, will use 50ppm SO2 preferment, fermK, same yeast, same mlb, an enzyme every ferment, always sacrificial oak chips, saignee for good measure and their favorite oak: heavy toast French…you get the idea.
Certainly there is a spectrum and I’d say most are in between these two extremes. On a Scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being winemaker #2, where do you stand?