I recently bought my first pH meter - a Hanna Checker, Model HI98103 <
details here> Mine is the newer model, and accuracy is +/- 0.2 pH. I am using it for both juice/must/wine and TA (total acid) titrations.
My model is capable of either one-point or two-point calibration. Hanna provides calibration material at pH 4.01, 7.01, and 10.01, and I believe the meter calibration process relies on using one (or two) of these levels. If doing a two-point calibration, one of the levels must be 7.01.
In <
this thread> ibglowin says
"[Use]
Only the 4.0 since the wines pH is always between 3.2 - 3.9. If you use 4.0 and 7.0 your basically calibrated then between those values. Your better off with a single point 4.0 since your samples is usually so close to the 4.0 anyway."
... to which grapeman replied,
"
Unless you use your meter for doing a TA test where you go to 8.2 and then you need to calibrate using both."
Following that advice would require calibrating my pH meter at 4.0 for wine and juice (one point), and at 7.01/10.01 (two-point) for TA titrations, right? While that is doable, it also would require a lot more time and materials to recalibrate every time I switch from wine to a TA titration. Which I would prefer to avoid unless necessary.
Does anyone know just how much accuracy suffers at pH 3.2, and at pH 8.2 - if my meter is calibrated from 4.0 to 7.0?
Maybe it would be best to have two pH meters, one calibrated for juice/wine and one for TA titrations? They are cheap enough. If I get another one, I might consider <
this one> which has no better accuracy than my Checker, but is made to be more reliable for juice/wine because it protects the probe better from particles. And it comes with pH 3.0 and 7.0 calibrators.
On the other hand, maybe it makes more sense to own one good pH meter, which can hopefully store two calibration curves, rather than two cheap meters? Like <
this one>?