My two cents...How do you suggest to back sweeten it, if desired?
Definitely taste it first. The residual sugar (which will be mostly fructose) might be enough. It all depends on what you're going for.
My two cents...How do you suggest to back sweeten it, if desired?
I've had a couple of failures when using larger increments, e.g., 1.010 to 1.030, hence my caution. If the yeast gives up the ghost at 1.040 ... that's what ya have for residual sugar. I'm a dryer-wine type, so having wine stopping at 1.020 is more likely to be palatable for me.I step feed my dessert wines in bigger increments than Bryan but it all works.
I use plain 'ole table sugar. Currently, I work with my son, and one of us gently stirs the wine with a drill-mounted stirring rod, while the other adds sugar in a fine stream. Stir for 1 minute after the sugar is all in, then taste. Repeat as needed.How do you suggest to back sweeten it, if desired?
Yup. A common question is, "How much RS do I need?"My two cents...
Definitely taste it first. The residual sugar (which will be mostly fructose) might be enough. It all depends on what you're going for.
You are so right.Always backsweeten by taste. The hydrometer is of no value when backsweetening, as it will never taste the wine. I check the value afterward, but not during.
That's true, but it ain't Port!I'm pretty sure most (might even go so far as to say all) wine kits have now added Style to their kits that are possibly covered by AOC rules and regulations, ala RJS Spagnols Italian Amarone Style Kit and the kits that used to be called Port Kits are now called Dessert Wine Kits. As home winemakers we can call it anything we like, we aren't commercial, we aren't selling, we aren't subject to those rules and regulations, but Wine Kits are.
That's true, but it ain't Port!
Just my thoughts, but if you're pleased and proud of what you make, why not give it an original name, not a copy.
Enter your email address to join: