I'm a good reviewer for you, but not a good beta tester.
As a reviewer -- I'm versed in identifying problems with the checklist. One thing that jumped out immediately is the format is too scrunched. Fields need to be larger to handle more text, regardless if you're writing on a printed sheet or typing it into a word processor. For a basic checklist it's fine, but the recording of exceptions is (IMO) more important than acknowledging that a basic step has been completed.
As a beta tester? I'm detail oriented, but in a different mindset.
The sheet has a lot of detail I don't see value in, e.g., marking each piece of equipment as sanitized. When I take notes, it's regarding my decisions and actions, not details such as sanitization. I have a jug of K-meta solution and hit everything with it, including racking from container to container, which gets the racking equipment as well.
Don't take this is a criticism of your process. Folks think differently, and what works for one person doesn't for another. As an example, I'm posting chunks from one of my notes to illustrate the differences. I chose this one as it's VERY non-typical, comprised of several grapes:
This is a 2-step process for me -- I use the basic list to remember what to add (or not). Then I go back and write in what I actually did. This list was updated several times, as Aging Oak was post-fermentation and Glycerin was at bottling time.
The K-meta was what was added up front -- I list when I add it (see below) but don't add up the amounts as that particular value isn't useful in the future. Each batch is different and I address each one according to its needs.
Each batch is different, so my notes are free form. I may check temperature ... or not. Checking SG depends on the day and if I decide it's of value to take the time.
Bottling was different for this batch, as it was used completely as a blending wine for 2 other wines:
My post bottling notes don't matter as much for this one, but most do.
