Craig:
Great notes and observations. Thanks so much for the input. I really appreciate it. It's not often that you can hand a bottle to someone and say "hey, does this taste like crap to you too?". I think your perceptions of the wine are similar to mine, though I don't recall noting much oak on this one. But as far as acid/bitter goes, we are in sync. It doesn't ruin the wine for me, but I just don't think that's what it was intended to be and it is less enjoyable than I think it should be. I'll be interested to see if you note similar properties on the Monastrell/Petit Verdot.
Very interesting about the crystals in the glass but not the bottle/decanter.
Edit: other than swapping yeast and barrel time, I didn't do much to this one. Started 1/18/14. I replaced kit yeast with D-254. It spent 12 weeks in a 1 year old barrel. Note on 10 July of that year: " Quite good already, even before barrel time. Wine is quite dry, but has nice fruit - shows both varietals well." Then on bottling day, Nov 3rd: "Wine tastes a little flat, with not much flavor.". Reading that reminds me of my other complaint with these wines: there's just not much there, aside from that bite.
Checked the decanter this morning, maybe two or three diamonds, nothing like my glass. Wonder if the short time I was in the 50*F garage with the glass (they follow me around the house) was enough to produce the diamonds. Maybe a glass and a half left in there, hummm, someone was thirsty last night. Surprised I'm not a bit hazy this morning.
Further on the oak. I think the barrel is able to impart more oak flavor in a pleasant way than you can with chips, cubes etc. It was good oak but not in your face oak. You are right on the flavor, it would be very one dimensional w/o the oak. But the base flavor is one I like very much. That sourness shows up in mine but because of their lack of age, maybe I'm used to it.