corinth
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2013
- Messages
- 453
- Reaction score
- 120
James:
I read the same article and it is excellent and makes some very good points.
Sour_grapes very well put. "....explains how expectations, environment, and social cues can fool us into perceiving that our wine tastes better or worse than we would perceive it to taste in absence of these cues" ? "
Some thoughts.
1. Sour grapes, you are right on with your statement and those words in bold are significant for a couple of reasons:
a. This type of research as been around for at least 40-50 years. That being said, maybe the research needs to be updated?
b.judges are subject to "social cues(who is in the audience),environment( what kind of day is it)expectations(very impressive label or I know who has submitted their wine) plus things such as the physical or emotional state of the judge( I am not feeling well today)
2. Great statistics but what you enter into it may be the problem.
3. Even with brain research, good stuff but NOT how a person decides if they like it. That is another matter completely
what about...
1. Everything is scanned these days. Why not share that info with us?
2. WHAT ABOUT WOMEN! if anyone watched 60 minutes last week, Women have not been included in a lot of reaearch. If wine tasting is going to the next level, studies are going to have to include seperate data for men and women.
3. Have the methods for wine tasting changed much in the last 20 to 30 years?
Maybe all the red flags going up is the start of significant change?
Corinth
I read the same article and it is excellent and makes some very good points.
Sour_grapes very well put. "....explains how expectations, environment, and social cues can fool us into perceiving that our wine tastes better or worse than we would perceive it to taste in absence of these cues" ? "
Some thoughts.
1. Sour grapes, you are right on with your statement and those words in bold are significant for a couple of reasons:
a. This type of research as been around for at least 40-50 years. That being said, maybe the research needs to be updated?
b.judges are subject to "social cues(who is in the audience),environment( what kind of day is it)expectations(very impressive label or I know who has submitted their wine) plus things such as the physical or emotional state of the judge( I am not feeling well today)
2. Great statistics but what you enter into it may be the problem.
3. Even with brain research, good stuff but NOT how a person decides if they like it. That is another matter completely
what about...
1. Everything is scanned these days. Why not share that info with us?
2. WHAT ABOUT WOMEN! if anyone watched 60 minutes last week, Women have not been included in a lot of reaearch. If wine tasting is going to the next level, studies are going to have to include seperate data for men and women.
3. Have the methods for wine tasting changed much in the last 20 to 30 years?
Maybe all the red flags going up is the start of significant change?
Corinth