Thought I'd add to this thread... I am scrambling to figure out what to do this year as I already bought BM 4x4 - a yeast not recommended for conventional MLF... Lavelin recommends co--inoculation...
I haven't done either one!
http://vinestovintages.ca/LaffortHelpfulHints/Co-Inoculation (yeast & bacteria).pdf
Second time I've seen this comment. I used BM4X4 last year on my cabs with sequential mlf with no issues. Please provide a reference for the not recommended comment. I'm a bit worried as I've decided to do all my reds with it this year and do mlf on them all.
If you open up the additional information tab it says 'very recommended' for co-inoculation.
OK I'm going out on a limb, so please jump in or on me
It says "not really recommended" under mlf compatibility.
It says "very recommended" under suitability for co-inoculation.
The data sheet says "promotes Mlf"
My interpretation: don't do mlf at the same time, sure mix with other yeast, and it will promote mlf after fermentation.
Other thoughts, please
My thoughts are 4x4 will start MLf on its own, if left to do so, I believe this is what it was made to do. But it can be co-inoculated, and will play nice with the MLB to completion ,not as well as later(or sequential), like after pressing. I believe this yeast is a mixture of yeasts to bring out fruity aromas that the 45 wouldn't do alone.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I've only been drinking beer today.
Edit: People have done it, I don't think it is a big problem. I see it as a sports car can do 180mph, but it's not recommended, nor was it designed to do so, but it will.
Yes, you've had too much beer, BM 4x4 will not start MLF on its own. BM4x4 is a yeast, MLF is carried out by bacteria. No bacteria, no MLF. If you have barrels that have bacteria in them, MLF can be started that way, and from other sources, just not a package of yeast.
Hmmmm, new product idea for all of you coinnoculators??????
Actually you mis-understood my thinking, which may still be wrong..???
Some areas in the world crush and ferment in cooler weather, so they let the wine sit, then as spring comes the temps start to warm and the MLF starts own its own. Is this not Correct?? Yes, that is correct.
If it will start on its own in the spring, (I wasn't saying the yeast will start the MLF {it can't because it's yeast and not bacteria} .
What I meant was it may let the MLF start on its own easier than other yeast would.(maybe it was designed with this in mind?)?? That I do not know for sure, but if the fermentation is over and the wine has been racked a time or two, there's not much yeast in there anyway, right?
AM I wrong on my understanding of this possibility??
I've been reading along as this thread developed. My interpretation is that with the BM4x4 you may co-inoculate with Malolactic Bacteria in the ferment, but it is not highly recommended to do so post ferment. It makes no sense that the word co-inoculate is referring to another yeast strain, as the 4x4 is already a blend of yeasts.
You are not wrong, it happens that way sometimes in wineries, maybe always, I don't know for sure, particularly in barrels that have already had MLF's wines in them. I don't have one yet, but will soon. We scrub and clean our fermenters and carboys to rid them of bacteria, and work to introduce MLB to our wines. I do know that I have four wines right now in MLF, that I used BM4x4 on, that are showing little progress as of my last chromo, which was yesterday.
I think the bacteria stains are present in the juice, the wine maker hopes that the spontaneous MLF will be from a desirable one that will change his wine naturally. As where the controlled MLF is supplied by the winemaker with a chosen bacteria that is most desired, with no chances of the natural being dominate. And this natural or spontaneous MLF can happen in a glass vessel.
Is this not correct?
Enter your email address to join: