Yep...though sweet!Isn’t White Zinfandel actually a Rose? I got a request to make a Rose and I can get a bucket for a great price in the fall. I suspect fermented dry, it should be palatable.
None really. I wouldn’t call them ‘tweaks’ but I did do some things to guide it along. But really ust trying not to screw it up!So I'm curious.....what tweaks folks have made to their Rose´(s)?
Im still super green regarding rosé and only just bottled my 1st attempts last week. I’m pretty sure it’s a tossup tho. Depending on the specific grapes sometimes it might benefit and sometimes not. Kinda like how winemakers will make decisions based off the taste of the unfermented juice, there’s likely lots of factors at play regarding this that are outta my pay grade.@Ajmassa, is MLF not suggested for rose’s?
Im still super green regarding rosé and only just bottled my 1st attempts last week. I’m pretty sure it’s a tossup tho. Depending on the specific grapes sometimes it might benefit and sometimes not. Kinda like how winemakers will make decisions based off the taste of the unfermented juice, there’s likely lots of factors at play regarding this that are outta my pay grade.
Since I don’t feel advanced enough to make judgement calls like that I just defaulted to treating it as if they were white wines. But the wine gods had other plans. Is what it is. I have no real way to know if it hurt the wine or benefited it. But I can say I’m happy with the final product despite the mlf.
I'll tell you good tweak for Rose's is a small fpac of strawberries.
was the ph still 3.4 post-fermentation?None really. I wouldn’t call them ‘tweaks’ but I did do some things to guide it along. But really ust trying not to screw it up!
I just bottled my first 2 from last year. First one I added acid upfront. Bumped ph to about 3.4. Sat for a day, racked off the sediment then Fermented dry w/ d47. From malbec grapes pressed right after crush. accidentally went thru MLf.
second one even less interference. Cab grapes. Bled the juice right after crush. Racked after a day. Then Left as is. Fermented with d47. Stopped short of dry at 1.003. So I have 1 dry and 1 sweet. Added lysozyme to cab preventing mlf. Oh and Both rosé’s i did cold stabilize for 3 weeks over the winter.
Nope. Good question. It crept up a bit like you correctly insinuated. Bumped to 3.4 from 3.65 or something. Came in at 3.48 post AF. Then eventually 3.52. (Accidental mlf).was the ph still 3.4 post-fermentation?
Cheers!
That looks tasty and refreshing.Did a small sample bottling of my Zinfadel Rose......sitting next to Beringer White Zin (mom's fav -- till she tries mine...backsweetened by the glass 4 her)
Never had heard of trying this combo before--I like your "think different" approach.Some might call my latest blend a 'buggers muddle' but the outcome is far from it. I had so many pears from my trees this year that I played with numerous blending options. i made a Rosé using 90% pear wine (11.5% abv) and 10% Sangiovese. The Sangiovese I made back in 2016. In my trials I found it softened and extended the flavour profile. If I were to repeat the exercise I’d run a trial at 5% Sangiovese - if only to produce more of a pink colour in the final blend. As at 10% it leans slightly towards a red hue. For those interested- the pH of this blend was 3.45
Did some small sampling of each tossed into an 18oz swing top bottle & chilled in fridge:Gonna use this 1st Rose (SG .994) as an experiment broken into 3 flavor profiles:
10bottles as is right from the Speidel
10bottles with glycerin added at rate of 1oz/gal
8-10bottles with glycerin + bit of liquid oak extract (chosen to save time)
Then we'll be doing a tasting of all 3 to get a winner.
Will report back...
Cheers!
Enter your email address to join: