An app would be incredible helpful.
John, you are in IT -- surely you could get my Excel spreadsheet to run, no?
I, on the other hand, don't have the "skilz" needed to compile an app.... sigh.
An app would be incredible helpful.
I can make an "app" The question is whether or not you would be comfortable running the .EXE
John, you are in IT -- surely you could get my Excel spreadsheet to run, no?
I, on the other hand, don't have the "skilz" needed to compile an app.... sigh.
I see that Seth already has a premium membership, but how about gifting one to Sourgrapes?
Yup, and now you get a bigger avatar....
Hmmmm,
Just signed on for a premium membership, but my avatar is still the same size. Wonder if I need to do anything....
Some guys are just smaller than others...
And while I understand what everybody is trying to do with formulas to make the perfect port.....one thing seems to have been forgotten......Taste.
Every year the grapes vary in the amount of acid, tannin etc. So while the initial baume etc may be the same as last years (I wish) the mouth feel will be completely different. More acid and tannins make the port taste less sweet even if you have your "perfect" residual sugar.
What I would suggest is to have a ballpark figure of say 120 to 140 g/l residual sugar.(adjust this figure to suit your own individual taste). when your baume hydrometer shows you are close to this figure I do a quick alcohol test which gives me how much alcohol to add to bring it up to say 18% let your taste buds tell you when to actually fortify your residual sugar will then drop to say 100 to 120 g/l.
John, I'm not taking a cheap shot at you or your port - if you were in the EU you wouldn't be allowed to call it port. From what I've read, port makers add young brandy to the must at about halfway point to let it kill off the yeast slowly. Then when it is dead they drain off the port. How long it takes to kill the yeast I don't know. If it's good enough for "so called Real port makers" then you're doing more or less the same thing. Can't seem to find any info on what they do with the skins afterwards.Seth,
That I exactly what I am saying. Maceration with the fortifier seemed to bring out more of the body of the wine.
This is how it worked out last year and I only have one trial using this method. I am not sure if the quality of the port is due to the particular year or is it truly due to allowing a higher alcohol contact with the skins.
This is why I am asking if anyone else has had similar results.
John, I'm not taking a cheap shot at you or your port - if you were in the EU you wouldn't be allowed to call it port.
From what I've read, port makers add young brandy to the must at about halfway point to let it kill off the yeast slowly. Then when it is dead they drain off the port. How long it takes to kill the yeast I don't know. If it's good enough for "so called Real port makers" then you're doing more or less the same thing. Can't seem to find any info on what they do with the skins afterwards.
“Port is not for the very young, the vain and the active. It is the comfort of age and the companion of the scholar and the philosopher”
-- Evelyn Waugh
Can't seem to find any info on what they do with the skins afterwards.
Quite right. I completely forgot about Grappa. Some of ti is very expensive."Grape pomace has traditionally been used to produce pomace brandy (such as grappa, orujo, törkölypálinka, zivania). Today, it is mostly used as fodder, as fertilizer, or to extract bioactive compounds like polyphenols from it."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pomace
"Rather than using the pomace as vineyard compost, turning it into feed supplements for cattle or dumping it in landfills, Seneca BioEnergy in Romulus, N.Y., plans to process the pomace, converting it into grapeseed oil, biodiesel fuel and manufactured soil. "
https://www.winespectator.com/articles/putting-pomace-to-work-4771
Enter your email address to join: