The real question is, will MLF quicken my wine being drinkable, I want it to be ready in 6-7 months from now.
The term "drinkable" means something different to everyone, and because you are ready, doesn't necessarily mean it will be. If you are asking, as it seems you are, "how will my wine taste in 6-7 months if MLF is done / not done?", not sure anyone can say unequivocally. It could be nice either way, it could be poor either way, but it'll be very young either way. Generally speaking, and I mean generally, not all, my belief is that the best quality reds are produced with MLF as a part of the winemaking regimen. That still doesn't mean you have to.
If your wine tastes acidic and sharp, MLF will make it better in 6-7 months than it would be without it, and better for all time past that mark. If you try to reduce the acidity / sharpness by other means, like potassium or calcium bicarbonate, the resultant wine can be lower in acidity (higher pH), but take on a flat or flabby mouthfeel. That's not a given either, there are many awesome high pH wines. Every grape is different, so every resulting wine is different too. I guess that's where it's more art than science.
Regardless of which path you choose, when you are doing medium to full bodied red wines from grapes, 6-7 months is infancy.
Most nice, commercially produced red wines, undergo MLF, spend many months, if not years, in barrels, before even being bottled and released to the general public for consumption.