I'll give you my understanding of Extended Maceration (EM), and I freely admit there's certainly more to it than I understand.You've been very helpful in the past so I was hoping you might give a explanation on the 2 week EM process and how you do it exactly. I'm trying to get a better understanding of EM, the benefits and how to incorporate it into a future FWK. If you would be kind enough to breakdown in some detail how you modify the primary/secondary processes, this would be very helpful!
Maceration is simply "soaking", e.g., macerated cherries is soaking cherries in rum, brandy, or other liquor.
The idea behind EM is to soak the pomace (grape solids after fermentation) in an alcoholic liquid (the wine) for a period to extract more "stuff" from the pomace. Conversely, cold soaking is allowing the must (unfermented grape solids & juice) to macerate BEFORE fermentation, so it's in a non-alcoholic liquid.
The mechanics of EM, as recommended by FWK, is to ferment the wine normally in an open fermenter to near completion (SG 1.010 to 1.020, I can't recall exactly what the instructions say, and anything in that range is fine). Give the wine a final stir and snap the lid on the fermenter and apply an airlock. It's important that the ferment is active, as CO2 needs to be produced during EM to protect the wine.
During EM the wine completes fermentation. The CO2 emitted pushes out the air so danger of oxidation is reduced or eliminated. My belief is that the CO2 coming from the wine pushes out the air -- there will be some mixing, but the air at the top of the container is pushed out, so during the process enough air is pushed out to be safe. [This is "educated" speculation on my part, and if someone can prove I'm wrong, please post!]
Due to humidity in the fermenter, it's not necessary to stir the must to keep the cap from drying out.
There is some disagreement regarding what happens during EM. I've found several scientific references that indicate most color and aroma are extracted relatively quickly during fermentation, but some additional pigment is extracted. Tannin is extracted more slowly and evenly, so it appears that more tannin is the bigger draw. I've read numerous articles on the subject, and this one has a graph that shows the relative rates in which things are extracted during EM. This graph matches other references I've read, so it appears to be fairly accurate.
https://winefolly.com/deep-dive/winemakers-red-wine-secret-extended-maceration/
Commercial winemakers are divided on usage of EM. Personally, I don't believe in "one size fits all" so usage depends on what you want. If I'm making a longer aging wine, EM makes sense, and I'd be tempted to do 2 to 4 weeks. Making a quicker drinking red? Nope! No EM for me!
Based upon what @Matteo_Lahm has said about the FWK instructions, it appears that EM not only produces a more complex wine, but it also helps ensure the wine is fermented to completion. That's an issue for kit vendors -- ensuring beginners who have no experienced help do not produce two dozen mini-volcanoes in the bottle. The FWK process gets 2 birds with the same stone.