On the 11th and 12th we racked the new wines and put the CS and CF in barrels. We had 4 carboys of Cabernet Franc with roughly 4 gallons in each, and I checked the SG and pH of each, with the following results:
The Avante batch started with SG 1.096 and pH 3.77, while the Bravo batch started with SG 1.094, and pH 3.75. Realistically speaking, identical.
The results at the first post-pressing racking:
#1 Bravo - SG 0.996, pH 3.37
#2 Bravo - SG 0.995, pH 3.41
#1 Avante - SG 0.993, pH 3.40
#2 Avante - SG 0.993, pH 3.36
I expected the pH of the Avante to be a bit higher as it eats malic acid, but on average it's 0.01 lower. Again, realistically there's no difference between two and I draw no conclusion.
I see the difference in SG to be more significant. The long term question is if the Bravo doesn't ferment out all the sugar OR if it's just not 100% done yet.
Unfortunately, I did not retain separate samples of both, as the nominal 56 liter barrel the wine is now in appears to hold well over 15 US gallons, so I have only 1.5 gallons of topup remaining. Before bottling 12 months from now, I'll have to top up with the CS/Merlot blend (which is perfectly fine, as we're making blends anyway).
The average SG of the four carboys is a bit over 0.994 (calculation is 0.99425, I can't measure with this discrimination). If that is the final SG, then there may be a difference between the finish of the Avante and Bravo, whereas if the SG is 0.993, then it appears the Bravo wasn't quite finished.
The difference is notable, and is mostly a point of curiosity on my part.
I have retained separate 4 liter jugs of Chambourcin made from both strains, and there is a difference in taste. The Avante is a bit fruitier tasting, which may be due to a lesser quantity of malic acid.
The Avante batch started with SG 1.096 and pH 3.77, while the Bravo batch started with SG 1.094, and pH 3.75. Realistically speaking, identical.
The results at the first post-pressing racking:
#1 Bravo - SG 0.996, pH 3.37
#2 Bravo - SG 0.995, pH 3.41
#1 Avante - SG 0.993, pH 3.40
#2 Avante - SG 0.993, pH 3.36
I expected the pH of the Avante to be a bit higher as it eats malic acid, but on average it's 0.01 lower. Again, realistically there's no difference between two and I draw no conclusion.
I see the difference in SG to be more significant. The long term question is if the Bravo doesn't ferment out all the sugar OR if it's just not 100% done yet.
Unfortunately, I did not retain separate samples of both, as the nominal 56 liter barrel the wine is now in appears to hold well over 15 US gallons, so I have only 1.5 gallons of topup remaining. Before bottling 12 months from now, I'll have to top up with the CS/Merlot blend (which is perfectly fine, as we're making blends anyway).
The average SG of the four carboys is a bit over 0.994 (calculation is 0.99425, I can't measure with this discrimination). If that is the final SG, then there may be a difference between the finish of the Avante and Bravo, whereas if the SG is 0.993, then it appears the Bravo wasn't quite finished.
The difference is notable, and is mostly a point of curiosity on my part.
I have retained separate 4 liter jugs of Chambourcin made from both strains, and there is a difference in taste. The Avante is a bit fruitier tasting, which may be due to a lesser quantity of malic acid.
Last edited: