I hope
@4score will chime in with his own notes and conclusions, but here is mine. 3 of the wines were made from grapes from my community’s vineyard, 1 from a nearby, pretty neglected home vineyard.
This was completely blind. We were tasting and comparing the wine at the same time, but neither knew which of the 4 wines we were tasting. We compared, contrasted and then ranked the wines in the order we liked them and then tried to decipher which wine was which, based on the look, smell and taste.
My wine, as previously discussed had 7% Petite Sirah blended in it and I picked this out immediately due to the strong tannins. This ended up being the only wine I got correct and my third most favorite wine.
My favorite wine ended up being made by the grapes from the neglected vineyard. It’s aromatics we’re crazy good and had layers of flavors, smooth as could be and frankly could be drunk now. Put it in a bottle for a few years and it will be crazy good.
My takeaways:
- The PS added tannin structure and mid palate flavor, but will drive the need for additional time in the bottle for it to be the best wine it can be, but will be very nice when it does.
- The aromatics were driven by the grape (different clone?) versus anything else.
- The two wines with the Prelude yeast tended to have a longer finish, but could be what they describe as improved mouthfeel.
- I did not pick out any strong differences due to the oak treatments.
- I took out my stash of Petit Verdot and added 2 ml to my glass of my wine and it improved the finish on it a lot. I saved a gallon of the PV that will be going into my CF, before I bottle it.