Fine - buy somewhere else. Easy peasy.Though I really understand this argument, I still believe that food should be safe regardless of size of the company producing them.
Fine - buy somewhere else. Easy peasy.Though I really understand this argument, I still believe that food should be safe regardless of size of the company producing them.
Partially. It's obviously easy to print and apply labels. It's what you put on them and how that affects you legally that I would be concerned with.I'm not sure if you are sarcastic now, it hardly rocket science to print a label online in production.
And that's why you can't get chicken from anything but a giant corporation and it tastes like cardboard. "Safer" isn't always better.Interesting point, but raw chicken also has the same warnings and still required to have ingredient statements.
That’s one way of approaching it. But let’s pray someone with a serious allergy doesn’t get hurt because the product was processed in a facility or by a worker that handles nuts or gluten products! I feel a safer and more conscientious approach is to add an Ingredient and allergen statement. But, I guess that’s for FWK to weigh out.Fine - buy somewhere else. Easy peasy.
Collecting and putting together an ingredients list and mark the ones that are allergens, if any, is a quickly done on a simple product as a wine kit.Partially. It's obviously easy to print and apply labels. It's what you put on them and how that affects you legally that I would be concerned with.
I can tell you're in the industry - that's exactly how I would expect you to feel. I'm not saying that's wrong, but the "if we could save one person from XXX malady" is why companies have huge legal departments and make products for the least common denominator. I don't work in the food industry (probably obvious ) and I like to raise a lot of my own food. To me, those labels are there for one primary purpose - to not get sued.That’s one way of approaching it. But let’s pray someone with a serious allergy doesn’t get hurt because the product was processed in a facility or by a worker that handles nuts or gluten products! I feel a safer and more conscientious approach is to add an Ingredient and allergen statement. But, I guess that’s for FWK to weigh out.
I can tell you're in the industry - that's exactly how I would expect you to feel. I'm not saying that's wrong, but the "if we could save one person from XXX malady" is why companies have huge legal departments and make products for the least common denominator. I don't work in the food industry (probably obvious ) and I like to raise a lot of my own food. To me, those labels are there for one primary purpose - to not get sued.
I'm sure you're correct. I'm certainly exaggerating, but it seems like everything is an allergen nowadays.Actually, that may be partially accurate but I can tell you that most retail consumers are now looking at labels, ingredient statements before they put an item in their shopping cart. Go to a local grocery store and just watch people. 20 years ago, there were very few allergen concerns, now there are so many more. True story! A major school district in the US will not buy any product that contains cinnamon…Cinnamon is now considered a potential allergen.
For sure! People sue for any and everything. I blame lawyers.This is because all it takes is one hellbent consumer to file a lawsuit and potentially destroy a company (financially or their reputation)! It happens all the time, especially around allergens these days.
Actually it is very easy, there are 3rd party companies that’s all they do. And cost is insignificant for the most part.I'm sure you're correct. I'm certainly exagerating, but it seems like everything is an allergen nowadays.
One more point about labeling - @Swedeman suggested that ingredients lists and allergen statements are easy, and I'm sure they are when it's being done at a food company with an in-house lab, corporate counsel, a marketing departments, chemists, biologists, etc. Not so easy when you're a one guy shop.
What's the cost per test? I'm assuming they'd need to do it for every product and variation. And they'd need to do it every time the formulation changes - annually at the very least. Then Matteo (or whoever) would have to hire a lawyer to review said testing, and someone else to write the ingredients list, nutritional and allergen statements in the correct way. I could be wrong, but when you're selling a few hundred (my guess) wine kits a year, that cost is going to be a lot more than insignificant.Actually it is very easy, there are 3rd party companies that’s all they do. And cost is insignificant for the most part.
For sure! People sue for any and everything. I blame lawyers.
Before I get hate mail thrown at me, let me just say I am a huge fan of FWK!! However, as a proponent and supporter of our Truth In Labeling laws in the US, the lack of transparency and labeling does raise a few questions for me. Especially since the bags are now coming without any vacuum seal or other protective seal under the caps. I am just saying I would like to have confidence that the product has been USDA approved, and would like to see an ingredient statement to ensure what I am consuming has no byproduct, extenders, preservatives or enhancers, at least something that tells me that I am not just drinking a “flavored Merlot fruit compote slurry” lol
What's the cost per test? I'm assuming they'd need to do it for every product and variation. And they'd need to do it every time the formulation changes - annually at the very least. Then Matteo (or whoever) would have to hire a lawyer to review said testing, and someone else to write the ingredients list, nutritional and allergen statements in the correct way. I could be wrong, but when you're selling a few hundred (my guess) wine kits a year, that cost is going to be a lot more than insignificant.
Thats why I was curious. My wife was reading the WE label and was shocked to see shrimp. I understand that is in the chitosan and most drops out but can it still induce an allergy for some allergic to shellfish.
You don't need to do any tests. I was recently contacted by a startup company that needed help preparing labels, I did that for free in my spare time since it doesn't take long. Admittedly only for 6 products.What's the cost per test? I'm assuming they'd need to do it for every product and variation. And they'd need to do it every time the formulation changes - annually at the very least. Then Matteo (or whoever) would have to hire a lawyer to review said testing, and someone else to write the ingredients list, nutritional and allergen statements in the correct way. I could be wrong, but when you're selling a few hundred (my guess) wine kits a year, that cost is going to be a lot more than insignificant.
They probably use a dedicated software, there are a few on the market, doing all the calculations for you based on your recipe.Actually it is very easy, there are 3rd party companies that’s all they do.
You could be right. To me, if it adds cost and labeling is not required, I hope he doesn't do it.Matteo likely already has a lawyer on retainer, so that’s not an issue…think about how many small (way smaller than FWK) consumer companies you see out there at farmers markets etc. if cost was a barrier to entry, you wouldn’t see so many startups in the food and beverage industry
You could be right. To me, if it adds cost and labeling is not required, I hope he doesn't do it.
Enter your email address to join: